Wednesday 31 October 2012

La Times Subscription

La Times Subscription

  From before he came to the court, Rehnquist was a provocative, pugilistic conservative. As a young man, he relished challenging seemingly settled ideas: He defended a hanging judge and the vigilance committees that substituted for conventional police in Gold Rush San Francisco. He followed the misguided scholarship of his Stanford mentor, Charles Fairman, who postulated that the 14th Amendment, which promises all Americans the equal protection of the law, meant something other than what it said. Rehnquist fired off self-satisfied letters to the editor, did his best to keep Latinos from voting in Arizona, annoyed Justice Robert Jackson, for whom he clerked, and argued for the preservation of school segregation when Brown vs. Board of Education came before the court.

La Times Subscription

La Times Subscription

La Times Subscription

La Times Subscription

La Times Subscription

La Times Subscription

La Times Subscription

La Times Subscription

La Times Subscription

La Times Subscription

La Times Subscription

La Times Subscription

La Times Subscription

La Times Subscription

La Times Subscription

La Times Subscription

La Times Subscription

La Times Subscription

La Times Subscription

No comments:

Post a Comment